مطالعات برنامه درسی

مطالعات برنامه درسی

ادراک کنشگران برنامه درسی از «حق بر انتخاب برنامه درسی»: مفهوم برنامه درسی مردمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانشیار گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
چکیده
هدف تحقیق پیش رو واکاوی ادراک کنشگران برنامه درسی درباره ی «حق بر انتخاب برنامه درسی» است. گفتمان پژوهش حاضر تفسیری – مشارکتی است. به همین منظور تصورات چهار گروه اصلی کنشگران برنامه درسی مدیران، استادان ، والدین و معلمان درباره ی اینکه چه کسانی حق انتخاب برنامه های درسی مدارس را دارند با روش گراندد تئوری از نوع ظهوریابنده مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته است. مشارکت کنندگان در این تحقیق (والدین، مدیران، استادان و معلمان) از طریق نمونه گیری نظری و با رویکرد اشباع نظری انتخاب شدند. یافته های تحقیق بیانگر اختلاف نظرهای متفاوت کنشگران در این باره بود که چه کسانی برای انتخاب برنامه های درسی ذی حق ترند. بر اساس تحلیل های انجام شده از مصاحبه ها، در مجموع 344 واقعه، 91 مفهوم، 35 طبقه یا کد محوری و4 کد بنیادی یا نظری، شامل برنامه درسی مردمی، برنامه درسی فضای عمومی، مردمان سرزمین برنامه درسی و برنامه درسی غیر مردمی استخراج شدند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing curriculum stakeholders’ perception of "the right to choose curriculum": the concept of popular curriculum

نویسنده English

mostafa ghaderi
Associate Profesasor, Curriculum Studies Department, Faculty of Psychology & Education, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The purpose of the upcoming research is to analyze the perception of curriculum stakeholders about the "right to choose the curriculum". The discourse of the present research is interpretative-participatory. For this purpose, the perceptions of the four main groups of curriculum activists about who has the right to choose school curricula have been analyzed using the emergent-type grounded theory method. Participants in this research (parents, managers, professors and teachers) were selected through theoretical sampling and theoretical saturation approach. The findings of the research showed the different opinions of the activists about who is more entitled to choose the curriculum. Based on the analysis of the interviews, a total of 344 events, 91 concepts, 35 categories or core codes and 4 fundamental or theoretical codes were extracted, including the popular curriculum, the public sphere curriculum, people of the land of curriculum and the non-popular curriculum. At the end, a conceptual framework for popular curriculum was presented. Based on the findings, the researcher believes that all activists have the right to choose curricula, and failure to respect the rights of various activists, including parents and teachers, as the most entitled groups, causes the failure, distrust and lack of legitimacy of curricula.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

the right to choose the curriculum
curriculum decision-making
right to curriculum
popular curriculum
public sphere curriculum
Ayers, W; Ayers, R; Dohrn, B. (2000). Zero Tolerance: Resisting the Drive for Punishment, A handbook for parents, students, educators and citizens, The New Press.
Eisner, E.W. (2001). Concerns and aspirations for qualitative research in the new millennium. Qualitative Research, 1 (2), 135-145.
Emerson, L., Fear. J., Fox, S., & Sanders, E. (2012). Parental engagement in learning and schooling: Lessons from research. Canberra, Australia: Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY), Family-School and Community Partnerships Bureau.
Farag, A. (2021). The fear of multiple truths: On teaching about racism in a predominately white school. Phi Delta Kappan, 102 (5), 18-23.
Ghaderi, M & Karamkar, S. (2019a). Curriculum and Culture: Confrontations and Convergences. Tehran: Avaye Noor Publications. [in Persian]
Ghaderi, M, Khosravi, M & Nosrati, N. (2019). The Story of Practical Discourse in Curriculum Studies: Schwab’s Practical Perspectives, Enhancing Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education, Curriculum Implementation and Change. Avaye Noor Publications. [in Persian]
Ghaderi, M. (2013). Reconceptualism in Curriculum Studies: From Reconceptualism to Post-Reconceptualism. Yadvareh-ye Ketab Publications (In Persian).
Ghaderi, M. (2020). Contexts of Curriculum Understanding (3rd Ed.). Tehran: Yadvareh-ye Ketab Publications. [in Persian]
Glaser, B. G. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding, Sociology Press.
Gooya, Z & Ghadaksaz Khpsroshahi, L. (2007). A novel explanation of centralization and decentralization, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1 (4), 17. magiran.com/p435408. [in Persian]
Gozali, C; Classen, T, E; Soto-Pena, M; Whang, C& Lunchei, T. F. (2017). Teacher Voice in Global Conversations around Education access, Equity and quality. Fire: Forum for International Research in Education, 4 (1).
Grumet, M. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
Harrop, S. (2000). Woman, Educational Policy Making and Administration in England. Authoritative in Women since 1800, Routledge.
Hesford, W.S. (1999). Framing Identities: Autobiography and the Politics of Pedagogy. University of Minue Sota Press.
Kessler, R. (2000). The soul of education. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2007). Simulaneous Governance of Different Levels of Decentralization in the Curriculum Development System, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1 (4), 1. magiran.com/p435407. [in Persian]
Pagano, J. (1988). The clime of Philia. In W. Pinar (Ed). Contemporary curriculum discourses (514-530). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Pagano, J. (1990). Exiles and Communities: teaching in the Patriarchal Wildness, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Parra, S.l; Bakker,C & Van Liere, L. (2020). Understanding Democracy in Dutch Curriculum Change through a Delphi Method, Curriculum and Teaching, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 5-22.
Parsa, A. (2007). An Investigation of Teacher's Attitude and Inclinations towards Implementing the New Curricula, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1 (4), 103. magiran.com/p435413. [in Persian]
Pinar, W. F. (1994). Autobiography, Politics and Sexuality: Essays in Curriculum Theory. 1972-1992. New York. Peter Long.
Pinar, W. F. (2006). What is Curriculum Theory? London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publisher.
Rogacheva, Y. (2016). The Reception of John Dewey’s Democratic Concept of School in Different Countries of the World. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 3 (2), 65-87. doi: http://dx.doi.org/.
Salsabili, N. (2007). A Study of the Iranian Curriculum Development System in Terms of Decentralizing Efforts with an emphasis on School-Based Strategy, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1 (4), 49. magiran.com/p435410.
Schneider, M. (2015). Common Core dilemma: Who owns our schools? Teachers College Press.
Seraji, F. (2007). Web based curriculum: A step towards decentralization or consolidation of centralization in the curriculum development system? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1 (4), 69. magiran.com/p435411. [in Persian]
Symeou, L. (2003). Fostering children’s learning: An investigation of the role of teacher-parentt briefing. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference Research Student Symposium, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, and 11 September 2003. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003196.htm
Wooten, S, C. (2011). Exploring the mother/teacher in Madeleine Grumet’s Bitter Milk: Women and Teaching, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, v27.pp317-324.
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 آبان 1404