Designing of Curriculum Model for Training Teacher Educator based on Competencie’s Reflective Practice

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 khu

2 cfu

3 Curriculum studies department, faculty of psychology and educational science, kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran

4 khU

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to Designing of Curriculum Model for Training Teacher Educator based on Competencie’s Reflective Practice. Using the method (Integrative Inquiry: The Research Synthesis), the text of the documents and handwritten texts available from the great scholars, in the field of education, teacher training was studied and after analyzing the propositions extracted from the foundations of education, The themes of "multidimensional negligence, comprehensiveness and meditation, micro-development and metacognition, and experimental learning and action in the position" were extracted. In order to achieve such key characteristics in educators,"reaching out to experiencing, discovering new methods with direct experience, creating learning willingness and motivation, Enhancing personal and team capabilities "accomplishes goals and "Extension of educational concepts and principles of education, The desire to expand knowledge and experience of teachers, build new knowledge and align with humanities and ethics " Promotes theoretical knowledge and "to create individual abilities along with group collaboration, membership in the organization Disparity, Educational Situation Analysis and Expansion of Thinking in Action" Practical knowledge realization and "Evaluation for learning rather than learning assessment, feedback from evaluation, looking at the multiple questions of the curriculum and position-based assessment based on ethical and value orientations" will lead to the implementation of the evaluation method.

Keywords

References

Ainsworth, S. & Loizou, A.T. (2003). The effects of self explaining when learning with texts or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
Boud, D. Cohen, R. & Walker, D. (1993). Using experience for learning. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
Boyd E & Fales A (1983). Reflective learning: the key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23 (2): 99-117.
Cepeda, N. J. Pashler, H. Vul, E. Wixted, J. T. & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380.
Chalmers, I. Hedges, L. & Cooper, H. (2002) A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and Health Professionals, 25, 12-37.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55, 6-11.
Eisner E. W (1986), the role of the art in cognition and curriculum, Journal of Art & Design Education, Vo 5, Issue 1-2.
Garrison, D. R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2): 95-105
Guha, R.V. & Lenat, D.B. (1994). Enabling agents to work together Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 126-142.
Gutek GL. Philosophical and ideological perspectives on education. 1st ed. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988: 167-69
Harris, I. (1991). Delibrative Inquiry: The Art of Planning. In short (ed). Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. University of New York Press. P. 286.
Jarvis P (1992) Reflective practice and nursing. Nurse Education Today, 12, 174-181.
Johnson, A. (2008). What every teacher should know about action research. Columbus, OH: Allyn and Bacon.
McKay, E.A. (2008, Forth coming) Reflective practice: doing, being and becoming a reflective practitioner. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
Mezirow, J. and Associates (2000) Learning as Transformation – Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, M. (Ed.) (2007). Handbook of distance education, (2nd Ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moreno, R. & Valdez, A. (2005). Cognitive Load and Learning Effects of Having Students Organize Pictures and Words in Multimedia Environments Educational Technology Research and Development.
Null, W. (2011). Curriculum: From theory to practice. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Ornstein, Allan C. & Hunkins, Francis P. (2012). Foundations, principles and issues. New York, NY: Allyn.
Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
Reid, W. (1999). Curriculum as Institution and practice: Essays in the Deliberative tradition. Lawrence Elbaum Associate, New Jersey.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think inaction. New York: basic Books.
Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and learning in the Professions, Sanfrancisco: Jossey bass.
Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78, 1–23.
Schwab J. J. (1970). The Practical: A Language for Curriculum(National Education Association, Center for the Study of Instruction).
Smith, l. & laurd, L. (2010). Exploring the advantages of blendedinstruction at community colleges and technical schools. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching.6(2): 508-515.
Wang, M. (2010). Online Collaboration and offline interactionbetween students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australian Journal of Education Technology. 26(6): 830-846.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 08 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 24 March 2019
  • Accept Date: 24 March 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics