پاتون، پل. (1379). فلسفه و تفکر از دیدگاه ژیل دلوز. ترجمه عبدالعلی دستغیب. نامه فلسفه، 9، 99-82.
سجادی، سید مهدی و ایمان‌زاده، علی. (1391). تبیین و تحلیل دلالت‌های تربیتی دیدگاه معرفت‌شناختی ژیل دلوز و نقد دلالت‌های آن برای تعلیم و تربیت. اندیشه‌های نوین تربیتی. شماره 4، 80-53.
سجادی، سید مهدی و ایمان‌زاده، علی. (1388). بررسی و تبیین فضای ریزوماتیک و دلالت‌های آن در برنامه درسی. فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی. شماره 12، 70-48.
ضیمران، محمد. (1383). ژیل دلوز و فلسفه دگرگونی و تباین. کتاب ماه ادبیات و فلسفه. شماره خرداد و تیر.
فتحی‌واجارگاه، کورش. (1386). برنامه درسی به‌سوی هویت‌های جدید. تهران: آییژ.
مهرمحمدی، محمود. (1392). تأملی بر مقوله تولید و تدوین برنامه درسی با تأکید بر اندیشه آیزنر: مأموریت منسوخ یا معتبر در رشته برنامه درسی؟ رویکردهای نوین آموزشی، 17، 20-1.
مهرمحمدی، محمود. (1387). تحلیلی بر سیاست کاهش تمرکز از برنامه‌ریزی درسی در آموزش عالی ایران: ضرورت‌ها و فرصت‌ها. مجله آموزش عالی ایران. 3، 18-1.
Chambers, C. (2003). As Canadian as possible under the circumstances: A view of contemporary curriculum discourses in Canada. In: W. F. Pinar (Ed.). International handbook of curriculum research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Publishers.
Chancellor, B. (2010). Cheonggyecheon: Streaming currere. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1, 16-31.
Doerr, M. (2004). Currere and the environmental autobiography. New York: Peter Lang.
Eisner, E. (1967). Franklin Bobbitt and the science of curriculum making. The School Review. 75 (1), 29-47.
Gough, N. (1998). Reflections and diffractions: Functions of fiction in curriculum inquiry. In: W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Curriculum toward new identities. New York: Garland Publishing.
Gough, N. (1994). Narration, reflection, diffraction: Aspects of fiction in educational inquiry. Australian Educational Researcher. 21 (3), 47-76.
Graham, R. J. (1992). Currere and reconceptualism: The progress of the pilgrimage 1975-1990. Curriculum Studies. 24 (1), 27-42.
Grumet, M. R. (1975). Existential and phenomenological foundations of currere: Self-report in curriculum inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA. Washington, D.C. April.
Hugo, W. (2010). Drawing the line in post-apartheid curriculum studies. In: W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Curriculum studies in South Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hwu, W. S. (2004). Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Daignault: Understanding curriculum as difference and sense. In: W. Reynolds & J. Webber (Eds.). Expanding curriculum theory: Dis/positions and lines of flights. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Jagodzinski, J. (2010). Deleuzeian thought. In: C. Kridel (Ed.). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. London: Sage.
Kanu, Y., & Glor, M. (2006). Currere to the rescue? Teachers as amateur intellectuals in a knowledge society. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies. 4 (2), 101-122.
Kincheloe, J. L. (1998). Pinar’s currere and identity in hyperreality: Grounding the post-formal notion of intrapersonal intelligence. In: W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Curriculum toward new identities. New York: Garland Publishing, INC.
Malewski, E. (2012). Reading the work of Elliot Eisner and the idea of reconceptualization in curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 9 (1), 17-20.
Malewski, E., & Rishel, T. (2010). Difficult thoughts, unspeakable practices. In: E. Malewski (Ed.). Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment. New York: Routledge.
Martin, J. V. (2009). Currere and the hours: Rebirth of the female self. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing. 25 (1), 100-109.
Miller, J. (2010). Autobiographical theory. In: C. Kridel (Ed.). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. London: Sage.
Morss, J. R. (2004). Gilles Deuleze and the space of education: Poststructuralism, critical psychology and schooled bodies. In: J. D. Marshal (Eds.). Poststructuralism, philosophy and pedagogy. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Padgham, R. E. (1988). Correspondences: Contemporary curriculum theory and twentieth century art. In: W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Contemporary curriculum discourses. Scottsdale, Arizona: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Publishers.
Pinar, W. F. (2010). Currere. In: C. Kridel (Ed.). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. London: Sage.
Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Pinar, W. F. (1975a). The method of currere. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA. Washington, D.C. April.
Pinar, W. F. (1975b). Currere: Toward reconceptualization. In: W. F. Pinar (Ed.). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (2004). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
Schubert, W. (2009). Currere and disciplinarity in curriculum studies: Possibilities for education research. Educational Researcher. 38, 136-143.
Schubert, W. (2008). Curriculum inquiry. In: F. M. Connelly., M. F. He., & J. Phillion. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Slattery. P. (2006). Curriculum development in postmodern era. New York: Routledge.
Wallin, J. (2011). What is curriculum theorizing: For a people yet to come. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30 (3), 285-301.
Wallin, J. (2010). A Deleuzian approach to curriculum: Essays on a pedagogical life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wang, H. (2010). The temporality of currere, change and teacher education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5 (4), 275-285.
Waterhouse, M. (2012). A Deleuzian approach to curriculum: Essays on a pedagogical life. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies. 10 (2), 174-182.
Wolfgang, C. (2012). A Deleuzian approach to curriculum: Essays on a pedagogical life. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. 58 (2), 306-308.
)
