Educational Implications of the Concept of Powerful Knowledge for Curriculum Theory

Authors

1 دانشجوی دکتری – برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

2 استاد تمام دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

3 دانشگاه تربیت مدرس


بنتون، ت.، کرایب، ی. (1384). فلسفه علوم اجتماعی: بنیادهای فلسفی تفکر اجتماعی (ش. مسمی‌پرست، م. متحد، مترجمان). تهران: آگه. (تاریخ انتشار اثر اصلی 2001).
جمشیدی، م. (1389)، مبانی روش‌شناسی تبیین، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه امام صادق.
سایر، آ. (1385). روش در علوم اجتماعی، رویکردی رئالیستی (ع. افروغ، مترجم). تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. (تاریخ انتشار اثر اصلی 1992).
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1391). کثرت روش شناسی پژوهش: افول پوزیتیویسم یا مرگ حقیقت؟.پژوهش‌نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت،2 (1)، 27-46.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). New York: Longman.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London ; Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. York: Books.
Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Broudy, H. S.; Smith, B. O. and Burnett, J. R. (1964). Democracy and Excellence in American Secondary Education. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Bruner, J. (1960). The importance of structure, In The Process of Education, New York, Vintage Books. pp. 1-32.
Charlot, B. (2009). School and the pupils’ work, Educational Sciences Journal, 10, pp. 87-94.
Collins, A. (2005). Cognitive Apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: (pp. 47-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coombs, J. R. and Daniels, L. B. (1991), Philosophical Inquiry: Conceptual Analysis, In Short, E. C. (eds.) Forms of Curriculum Inquiry,SUNYPress, pp. 27-42.
Durkheim, E., & Fields, K. E. (1967). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of Knowledge and Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 463-477.
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge : selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, Continuum.
Hirst, P. (1974). The forms of knowledge: revisited. In Knowledge and curriculum. London, Routledge & Keagan Paul. pp. 84-100.
Järvinen, P. (2004). On research methods, Opinpajan Kirja.
Moore, R. (2000). "For Knowledge: Tradition, progressivism and progress in education—reconstructing the curriculum debate." Cambridge Journal of Education 30(1): 17-36.
Moore, R. (2006). Knowledge, power and educational reform: applying the sociology of Basil Bernstein. New York; London, Routledge.
Moore, R. (2007). Sociology of knowledge and education. London; New York, Continuum.
Moore, R. (2009). Towards the sociology of truth. London ; New York: Continuum International Pub. Group.
Moore, R. (2013). Social Realism and the problem of the problem of knowledge in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 333-353.
Maton, K., & Moore, R. (2010). Social realism, knowledge and the sociology of education : coalitions of the mind. London ; New York: Continuum.
Phenix, P. H. (1964). Realms of Meaning. New York, McGraw-Hill.
Popper, K. (1978). Three Worlds - The Tanner Lecture on Human Values - Delivered at The University of Michigan on April 7, Open Science Repository Philosophy, Online(open-access), e70081900. doi:10.7392/openaccess.70081900.
Schwab, J. (1962) the concept of the structure of a discipline, Educational Record, 43, 197-205.
Shuell, T. J. (2001). Learning Theories and Educational Paradigms A2 - Smelser, Neil J. In P. B. Baltes (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 8613-8620). Oxford: Pergamon.
Spencer, H. (1860) what knowledge is of most worth? In Ronald Gross (Ed) (1963). The teacher and the Taught. New York: Dell Publishing. pp. 69-100.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge,: M.I.T. Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Young, M. (ed.) (1971) Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education, London: Collier Macmillan.
Young, M. F. D. (1998). The curriculum of the future : from the "new sociology of education" to a critical theory of learning. London ; Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Young, M. )2008a(. Bringing knowledge back: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
Young, M. (2008b) What are schools for?, in: H. Daniels, H. Lauder, J. Porter (Eds.) Knowledge,
values and educational policy: A critical perspective. Vol. 2 (London, Routledge).
Young, M. (2009). Education, globalization and the ‘voice of knowledge’, Journal of Education and Work, 22, pp. 193–204.
Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 7-13.
Young, M., et al. (2015). Knowledge and the Future School: Curriculum and Social Justice, Bloomsbury Publishing.