Iranian Journal of Curriculum Studies

Iranian Journal of Curriculum Studies

The Curriculum Enrichment Pattern for Top Talented Students in Second Elementary Level: A Grounded Theory Research

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
2 , Department of Psychology and Education for Children with Special Needs, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to identify a curriculum enrichment pattern for top talented students in second elementary level and it was done with systematic grounded theory. The participants included 27 teachers of second elementary level in Birjand city, who were selected with purposeful sampling and their views were investigated with open and depth interview. The data was analyzed with the Corbin and Strauss approach. The findings included 175 open codes, 32 axial codes, 13 selective codes. The results showed the components of curriculum enrichment (core category), intra-school communication, coordination of internal and external organizational factors, culture building (causal conditions), conditions and facilities, supporting top talents (contextual factors), motivational, structural and social limitations (intervening conditions), use of outside school capacities, adapting learning activities and content to individual differences, use of rich learning resources and environments, use of diverse teaching and learning methods (strategies), all-round development of student, improving learning and its application in life (consequences), impress teachers performance in curriculum enrichment.
 
Keywords

Subjects


Alipour, M., Ayati, M., & Soorgi, F. (2019). Investigating the Correlation of Teachers' and Parents' Views on Students' Talent (Shahab Plan). Rooyesh ravanshenasi. 8(9), 189-198. [Persian].
AminZadeh, H. M., Seifi, M., & Faghihi, A. R. (2017). The Consistency among the Intended, Implemented, and the Attained Curriculum in Thinking and Inquiry Course of 6thGrade. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S), 12(46), 149-170. [Persian].
Anderson, J. (2020). The STEM education phenomenon and its impact on school curriculum. Curriculum Perspectives, 40, 217-223.
Andic, B., Ulbrich, E., Dana‑Picard, T., Cvjetićanin, S., Petrović, F., Lavicza, Z., & Maricic, M. (2023). A Phenomenography Study of STEM Teachers’ Conceptions of Using Three‑Dimensional Modeling and Printing (3DMP) in Teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 45-60.
Andree, M., & Hansson, L. (2020). Industrial actors and their rationales for engaging in STEM education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 551-576.
Ayati, M., Asadi Younesi, M. R., & Azadegan, A. (2017). Confirmatory factor analysis of the identification scale of gifted students. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 27, 161-181. [Persian].
Brigandi, C. B., Siegle, D., Weiner, J. M., Gubbins, E. J., & Little, C. A. (2016). Gifted secondary school students: The perceived relationship between enrichment and goal valuation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(4), 263-287.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
Crabtree, L. M., Richardson, S. C., & Lewis, C. W. (2019). The gifted gap, STEM education, and economic immobility. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30 (2), 203-231.
Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.
Ghasemi, S. (2021). The Role and Function of Media in Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Sciences(JNAES), 2(4), 75-82. [Persian].
Hajkazemian, M., Hoveida, R., Abedi, A., & Rajaipour, S. (2018). Analytical review of full-time grouping student of Estedadhaye Derakhshan schools. Applied Psychological Research Quarterly, 9(1),87-116. [Persian].
Hallman, S., Massoud, L., & Tomiuk, D. (2020). An integrating model for excellence: Mentorship to enrich the three pillars of education. Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, 1-8.
Kalbasi, A., Aghahosseini, T., & Fardin, M. (2020). Identifying and prioritizing the educational needs of primary school teachers implementing the Shahab program. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S), 15(56), 167-192. [Persian].
Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102-116.
Knaus, T. (2023). Emotions in Media Education: How media based emotions enrich classroom teaching and learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100504.
Machu, E. (2015). Analyzing Differentiated Instructions in Inclusive Education of Gifted Preschoolers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 1147–1155.
Mathias, B., & Kriegstein, K. (2023). Enriched learning: behavior, brain, and computation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (27)1, 81-97.
McCormick, M. P., Weiland, C., Hsueh, J., Maier, M., Hagos, R., Snow, C., & Schick, L. (2020). Promoting content-enriched alignment across the early grades: A study of policies & practices in the Boston Public Schools. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52, 57-73.
Mosapour, N., Falahati, L., & Mazinani, M. (2018). A Study of the Effects of Informal Curriculum of Teacher Training University on Realization of Educational Goals. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S), 12(47), 1-36. [Persian].
Navidi, A. (2019). Evaluation of the Trial Implementation of the Shahaab Project. QJOE, 35 (1), 51-72. [Persian].
Neher‑Asylbekov, S., & Wagner, I. (2023). Effects of Out‑of‑School STEM Learning Environments on Student Interest: a Critical Systematic Literature Review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 6, 1-44.
Olamafar, M. M., Hemati, M. J., & Moleli, G. (2020). A review of teaching methods for gifted students. Iranian Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 117-131. [Persian].
Park, W., & Cho, H. (2022). The interaction of history and STEM learning goals in teacher‑developed curriculum materials: opportunities and challenges for STEAM education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23, 457-474.
Peairs, K. F., Putallaz, M., & Costanzo, P. R. (2019). From a (aggression) to v (victimization): Peer status and adjustment among academically gifted students in early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 185-200.
Rashidi, B., Abedi, A., & Norouzi, Gh. (2022). Developing the Curriculum Enrichment Model for Gifted and Talented School in Iran: A Grounded Theory Study. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S), 17(66), 259-288. [Persian].
Rashidi, A., Rahmati, M. H., Khanifar, H., & Naderi, N. (2022). Develop a Model for the Participation of Institutions and Institutions with the Formal and Public Education System (A Meta-Synthesis Study). Educational and Scholastic Studies, 11(1), 403-425. [Persian].
Reis, S. M., & Peters, P. M. (2021). Research on the Schoolwide Enrichment Model: Four decades of insights, innovation, and evolution. Gifted Education International, 37(2), 109-141.
Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2021). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real-world, student-driven learning. Routledge.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2021). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A How-to Guide for Talent Development. 3th Edition, Routledge, New York.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2018). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental approach for promoting creative productivity in young people. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 185–199). American Psychological Association.
Shoushtari, M., Malekpour, M., Abedi, A., & Ghamarani, A. (2016). Examination of the effectiveness of Renzulli’s Enrichment Triad Program on Creativity of sharp-witted primary school level students. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 22, 91-116. [Persian].
Sternberg, R. J. (2021). A new model of giftedness emphasizing active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership that can make a positive, meaningful, and potentially enduring difference to the world. In Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 407-424). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Sternberg, R., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. (2011). Explorations in Giftedness. New York, Cambridge university press.
Stollman, S., Meirink, J., Westenberg, M., & Van Driel, J. (2019). Teachers’ interactive cognitions of differentiated instruction in a context of student talent development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 138-149.
Talae, E., Hassanabadi, H. R., Bararpour, G., Seyed Mirzaee Jehaghi, A., & Baneshi, A. (2018). Enriching Home Learning Environment of Gifted Children: A Comparison between those who did Grade Skipping and their Counterparts. QJFR, 15(2), 7-30. [Persian].
Talehi, A. A., & pour Omran, M. (2020). Studying the impact of the project to identify and guide superior talents (Shahab) on equal educational opportunities and academic self-fulfillment of students. Quarterly Journal of talent development, 2(3), 47-61. [Persian].
Thomas, D. R., & Larwin, K. H. (2023). A meta‑analytic investigation of the impact of middle school STEM education: where are all the students of color?. International Journal of STEM Education, 43(10), 1-25.
Tordjman, S., Besançon, M., Pennycook, C., & Lubart, T. (2021). Children with High Intellectual and Creative Potential: Perspectives from a Developmental Psycho-Environmental Approach. In Sternberg, R. J., & Ambrose, D. (Eds.). (2021). Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 251-279). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yazdanshenas, F., Parsa, A., & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2019). Challenges of separation of the gifted and talented students: A mixed approach. Journal of curriculum research, 9(1), 260-298. [Persian].
Yoon, J., Kim, K. J., & Koo, K. (2020). Enrichment program for the ethnic minority of gifted and talented students in science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 36-50.

  • Receive Date 31 July 2024
  • Revise Date 25 October 2024
  • Accept Date 29 November 2024