خاکباز، عظیمه السادات؛ علم الهدی، جمیله؛ موسی‌پور، نعمت‌الله و بابلیان، اسماعیل (1390). کالبدشکافی دانش محتوایی-تربیتی به عنوان نوعی دانش میان رشته‌ای برای تدریس دانشگاهی، فصلنامه مطالعات میان رشته‌ایدر علوم انسانی زمستان 1390 ، دوره 4، شماره 1 (پیاپی 13).
زرقانی، اعظم؛ امین خندقی، مقصود؛ شعبانی ورکی، بختیار و موسی‌پور، نعمت‌الله (1395). ارتباط دانش نظری و عملی معلمان در پارادایم‌های اجرای برنامه درسی، مجله پژوهشنامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت سال 1 شماره6 بهار و تابستان 1395 ، 68 -46.
شورت، ادموند سی (1392). ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی. روش شناسی مطالعات برنامه درسی، چاپ سوم، 1392، انتشارات سمت.
فتحی واجارگاه، کورش (1392). برنامه درسی به سوی هویت‌های جدید" شرحی بر نظریات معاصر برنامه درسی" چاپ دوم، انتشارات آییژ.
گندمی، فهیمه؛ مهرمحمدی، محمود؛ سجادی، سید مهدی و طلایی ابراهیم (1396). تبین یادگیری و بالندگی حرفه‌ای معلمان بر مبنای مفهوم کورره در معنای فعال و زاینده آن، فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی، سال یازدهم شماره 43.
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1393). درآمدی بر شوآب و شوآب شناسی.، فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی ایران، سال هشتم، شماره32، بهار1393.
Ben-Peretz, M. (2011). Teacher knowledge: what is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 3-9.
Beth. H (2010), Teacher as Curriculum Leader A Consideration of the Appropriateness of that Role Assignment to Classroom-Based Practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, Volume 3, Number 3, Winter 2010.
Brown, M. W. (2002). Teaching by design: Understanding the interactions between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern 1University,Evanston, IL.
Brown, M. W., & Edelson, D. C. (2010, April). Teaching by design: Curriculum designas a lens on
instructional practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1986). On narrative method, personal philosophy, and the story of
teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23,293–310.
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook
affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 103 (3) , 287.
Davis, A. (2017).Educative curriculum materials and the Next Generation Science Standards. University of Michigan, A paper prepared for the Board on Science Education's workshop on the Design, Selection, and
Implementation of Instructional Materials for the Next Generation Science Standards, June 2017.
Davis, E. A. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analyzing teachers’ knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34 (1) , 21–53.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Supporting inquiry-oriented science teaching: Design heuristics for educative curriculum materials. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American EducationalResearch Association, San Diego.
Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Arias, A., Bismack, A., Marulis, L., & Iwashyna, S. (2014).Designing
educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process. Harvard Educational
Review, 84 (1) , 24-52.
Eisner, Elliot W. (1994). The Educational Imagination. New Yourk: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Dow, P. B. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Keiser, J. M., & Lambdin, D. V. (1996). The clock is ticking: Time constraint issues in mathematics
teaching reform. Journal of Educational Research, 90 (1) , 23–30.
Kimpston, R. & Anderson, D. (1986). The Locus of Curriculum Decision Making and Teachers’
Perceptions of Their Owen Attitudes and behaviors toward Curriculum Planning. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision. Vol. 1, No. 2, 100-110.
Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers:Understanding
the connections. Journal of Educational Research, 92 (1) , 27–41.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to sayabout research
on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29 (1) , 4–15.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers' Use of Mathematics Curricula.
Review of Educational Research, Vol. 75, No. 2 (Summer, 2005) , pp. 211-246.
Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining
teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29 (3) , 315–342.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. (Reprinted in 1995).
Schwab, J. J. (1978). The practical: A language for curriculum. In I. Westbury. & N. J. Wilkof. (Eds.).
Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays (pp. 287-321).
Schwab, J. (1983). The Practical 4: Something for Curriculum Professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry. V.13,
No3. P.257.
Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2004). Identifying patterns in teachers’ use of areform-basedelementary mathematicscurriculum. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Walker, D. & Soltis, J. (2004). Curriculum and Aims. New York & London. Teacher College Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
)
