Evaluation of The Enacted New Physics Curriculum: A Research based on Eisner' s Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 student

2 khu

3 curriculum studies department, faculty of psychology and educational science. kharazmi university. tehran. iran

4 education

Abstract

The Enacted curriculum is, in fact, the interpretation and perception that teachers intend of the curriculum and implement it accordingly. The aim of the present applied research is to evaluate the new physics curriculum in action using Eisner's educational connoisseurship and criticism humanistic model, which has been done with a qualitative approach and live critique method. In this research, purposeful convenience sampling and data collection using observation tools with continuous presence of critics in seven physics classes in different schools, semi-structured interviews, open-ended questionnaires, recording speech interactions and imaging have been used. Data analysis was performed by content analysis using open and axial coding and led to the identification of 88 basic themes, 20 organizing themes and 5 global themes. In order to validate the research, the structural corroboration, consensual validation, referential adequacy have been met. Given the results obtained And insufficient compliance with curricula, effective teacher training on upstream documents as well as the new curriculum seems necessary.

Keywords

References

Ary, D. Jacobs, L. & Razavieh, A. (1996). Introduction to Research in Education (5th edition). Florida: Rinehart & Winston.
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school Programs. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Gahin, G., & Myhill, D. (2001). The communicative approach in Egypt: Exploring the secrets of the pyramids. TEEL Web Journal, 1 (2), Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http: //www.teflweb-j.org/v1n2/Gahin_Myhill.html.
Hall , S. (2012). What Is Educational Evaluation? .Journal Assessment & Evaluation in HigherEducation,Volume37,Issue4,2012,fromhttp://www.ehow.com/facts_5006257_what-educational.
Joseph, O. O. (2021). A Review: Models Of Curriculum Evaluation Presented By Okparaugo Obinna Joseph Curriculum Evaluation Department Of Education Foundation Faculty Of Education School Of Post Graduate Studies Federal University.Curriculum Model Review, FUDMA. Https://Doi.Org/10.14221/Ajte.1988v13n2.1
Karvas-Doukas, E. (1995). Teacher identified factors affecting the implementation of acurriculum innovation in Greek public secondary schools. Culture and Curriculum, 8 (1), 53-65.
Mutlu, G. (2020). A Look Into Curriculum Evaluation And Curriculum Evaluation Models. Theory and Research in Educational Sciences II, 227.‏
Nyaumwe, J. Lovemore. Ngoepe, G. Mapula. Phoshoko M,Moshe. (2010). Some Pedagogical Tensions in the Implementation of the Mathematics Curriculum: Implications for Teacher Education in South Africa University of South Africa, Analytical Reports in International Education, Vol. 3. No. 1, June 2010, pp. 63-75.
Oliva,p. (2008). Developing the Curriculum. Boston: Pearson press.
Panek, Hanna ,S. (2012).Context Based Science Instruction. Education and Human Development Master's Theses between Context and Science Knowledge.
Wallen, N. E. & Frankel, J. R. (2001). Educational Research: A guide to the process (Second Edition). Mahwah: Lawerance Erlbaum Accociate.
Wang, H. (2001). Integrating grammar instruction with communicative approaches for EFL students in China. Unpublished Master's Research Essay. Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Wang, H., & Han, H. (2002). The development of collage English curriculum in China. Carleton Paper in Applied Language Studies, 16/17. 75-97.
Yullmaz, G. K., Alkan. S., Baran. D., Elmas. H, Güven. B. (2011). Mathematics teachers’ views about measurement and evaluation dimension of new Turkish geometry curriculum. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Scineces,v15.p2678-2683.
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Volume 17, Issue 66
July 2022
Pages 177-210

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 14 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 08 February 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics