اسلامی، ایوب، محمودی، احمد.، خبیری، محمد. و نجفیان رضوی، سیدمهدی. (1392). تعیین وضعیت اجتماعی – اقتصادی در انگیزه مشارکت شهروندان به ورزشهای همگانی – تفریحی. فصلنامه پژوهشهای کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی، 2(3)، 104-89.
خالقینژاد، سیدعلی. (1398). ویژگی‌ها و کاربردهای آزمون پیزا و مقایسه آن با آزمون‌های تیمز و پرلز. گزارش مروری، وزارت آموزش و پرورش، پژوهشگاه مطالعات آموزش و پرورش.
قدرتنما، اکبر.، حیدرنژاد، صدیقه، داوودی، ایران. (1392). رابطه بین وضعیت اجتماعی – اقتصادی و میزان فعالیت فیزیکی دانشجویان دانشگاه شهید چمران. نشریه مدیریت ورزشی، 5 (16)، 20- 5.
کبیری، مسعود. (1394). برنامه بینالمللی سنجش دانشآموزان (پیزا). دانشنامه ایرانی برنامه درسی: انجمن مطالعات برنامه درسی ایران.
Adepoju, O.E. (2017). Demographic factors affecting ICT utilization by undergraduate students in Nigeria. International Journal of Library and Information Science Studies Vol.3.(2), 20-33.
Alexander, M.A. (2008). Ethic-Identity intensity as a moderator of the technology acceptance model and its antecedents. Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University. (UMI No. AAT 3307103).
European Commission (2016). Study on the role and potential of ICT and OER to open up access to learning and to promote social inclusion and better outcomes in education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Commission.
Flores, R., Inan, F., & Lin, Z. (2013). How do the different types of computer use affect math achievement? Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching, 32(1), 67-87.
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T. & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report. Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.
Friemel, T.N.(2014). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media Soc., 18(2), 313-331.
Guzeller, C. O. and Akin A. (2014) Relationship between ICT variables and math achievement based on PISA 2006 database: international evidence. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 184-192.
Kozma, R.B. (2008).Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt, & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
Law, N., Pelgrum, W., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world:Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong SAR: Comparative Education Research Centre/Springer, University of Hong Kong.
Lissitsa, S. & Chachashvili-Bolotin, S. (2015). Does the wind of change blow in late adulthood? Adoption of ICT by senior citizens during the past decade. Poetics. Poetics, 52, 44-63.
Liu, X., Toki, E.I. & Pange, J. (2014). The use of ICT in preschool education in Greece and China: A comparative study. Social and Behavioral Sciences 112, 1167-1176.
Luu, K. & Freeman, J.G. (2010). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers and Education, 56, 1072-1082.
Marwan, A. & Sweeney, T. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of educational technology integration in an Indonesian polytechnic. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30 (4), 463–476.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Notten, N. & Kraaykamp, G. (2009). Home media and science performance: A cross-national study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 367-384.
Olatokun, W.W. (2009). Analyzing socio-demographic differences in access and use of ICTs in Nigeria using the capability approach. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 479-496.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). PISA 2009 Results: Students on Line: Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume VI). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). PISA in Focus 64 - Are there differences in how advantaged and disadvantaged students use the Internet? Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rodrigues, J., Margarida, Maria, Federico, B. (2017). Digital technologies and learning outcomes of students from low socio-economic background: An Analysis of PISA 2015. Publications Office of the European Union.
Sari, A. (2014). Influence of ICT applications on learning process in higher education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116 (2014) 4939 – 4945.
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A. & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 1607-1624.
Tuncer, M., Dogan, Y., & Tanas, R. (2013). Investigation of vocational high-school students' computer anxiety. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 90-05.
Vanderlinde, R., Aesaert, K., & Braak, J. (2014). Institutionalised ICT use in primary education: a multilevel analysis. Computers and Education, 72, 1-10.
Wells, J. & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005 (NCES 2007-020). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Yalman, M. & Tunga, M.A. (2014). Examining the attitudes of students from state and foundation universities in Turkey towards the computer and www (World Wide Web). Education and Science, 39(137), 222-233.
Yaman, I. (2015). Digital divide within the context of language and foreign language teaching. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 766 – 771.
Yu, R.P., Ellison, N.B., McCammon, R.J, Langa, K.M. (2016). Mapping the two levels of digital divide: Internet access and social network site adoption among older adults in the USA. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1445-1464.
Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How Does ICT Use Influence Students’ Achievements in Math and Science Over Time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2431-2449.
)
